111 Real Ways to Actually Make Money Online

fastest way to make money online,99 ways to bring in additional income

Best Stay-at-Home Jobs You Can Do
EASY to Make Money from HOME
(2021 Updated)
890 Reviews
(Apr 1st)
948 Reviews
(Apr 3rd)
877 Reviews
(Apr 2nd)

H&M’s Taobao, JD.com flagship stores’ disappear ‘after infuriating Chinese Internet users

H&M’s flagship store has disappeared on e-commerce platforms such as Taobao and JD.com, according to a search by Chinese Internet users on Wednesday afternoon, after the company’s announcement that it will boycott products from Xinjiang angered Chinese netizens.

A search for “H&M” on Taobao’s APP found that the brand’s flagship store and its products had “disappeared” from the platform, with a page showing “I’m sorry, but I can’t find the relevant products.”

A search for “H&M” on JD.com’s APP also directly showed “no search results for” H&M “and recommended related products from other brands.

Similarly, the Pinduoduo platform can not search for H&M products related results.

Today, “H&M’s announcement that it will boycott products from Xinjiang” has sparked a backlash on social media in China. The statement declares that H&M Group is deeply concerned about reports from civil society organizations and media reports, including allegations of forced labor and religious discrimination against ethnic minorities in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. In the statement, H&M Group stated, “We do not work with any garment manufacturing factories located in Xinjiang, nor do we source products/raw materials from the region.”

Many netizens angrily said: while boycotting Xinjiang products, and at the same time want to make money from Chinese people? Wishful thinking! “I will never buy H&M again,” said another.

Song Qian’s studio released a statement on its official Weibo account on Monday afternoon, saying that Song Qian, her studio and H&M are not currently in any partnership, and that national interests are above all else. Earlier, Huang Xuan’s studio also posted on Weibo that it has no cooperation with H&M.

Dig! There are people behind H&M!

Write/small tiger knife & murmur sister

Many people are saying that #HM racketeer Xinjiang Cotton # is worthy of a popular search.

A statement issued by H&M last October about “stopping the use of Xinjiang cotton” went viral on Weibo today, drawing a lot of righteous and indignantly criticized online, with some even calling out “resolute boycott”.

Soon after, Huang Xuan and Song Qian, two of H&M’s spokespeople in Greater China, announced they were ending their relationship with the company. Tmall and JD.com have also been unable to find H&M products on their apps, and they are suspected to have been removed from the shelves.

When asked about the incident, the Swedish head office of H&M Group said it was “unable to respond over the phone and will reply after checking the email”.

Up to now, no reply.

Some netizens also pointed out that Uniqlo, Nike, Adidas and many other companies hold the same position with H&M.

One thing they all have in common is that they are members of the Good Cotton Development Association (BCI).

What role did BCI play in the “stop using cotton from Xinjiang” incident? H&M really braided Chinese netizens to stop using cotton from Xinjiang, and the well-known enterprises in Yishui also followed suit and stopped using cotton?Last night, a blogger reported that H&M had voluntarily banned cotton and outsourcing factories from Xinjiang.

Make money in China while spreading rumors about the boycott.

Such a statement was infuriating to the public in a country that will be H&M’s fourth-largest market in 2020.Of course, some netizens mocked that the quality of H&M’s clothes does not match the cotton from Xinjiang.

There’s even the word of the day: HM, Huang Miu.

H&M’s “due diligence statement,” issued in October 2020, said it was “discontinuing the use” of cotton produced in Xinjiang, citing “forced labor” in the region.

Mei Dao will draw the key points for you.

The statement stated that H&M was “deeply concerned about reports from civil society organizations and media reports, including allegations of forced labor and religious discrimination against ethnic minorities in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.”

The conclusion: H&M Group states that “we do not work with or source products/raw materials from any garment manufacturing plant located in Xinjiang”.

It’s BCI’s turn.

“Our suppliers source cotton from BCI-related farms in the region,” the H&M statement said. As it has become increasingly difficult to conduct credible due diligence in the region, BCI has decided to suspend the issuance of BCI cotton licences in Xinjiang. That means the cotton we need for our products will no longer be available from there.”

The statement has now been removed from the H&M website, but a screenshot of the previous page can still be seen.That is to say, H&M made the decision to “stop using cotton from Xinjiang” based on the judgment of BCI and some so-called private reports and media reports.

Dao noted that this isn’t the first time H&M has taken a stand on the Xinjiang issue.

The statement came just a month after H&M announced in September 2020 that it was ending “indirect business dealings” with Huafu, a giant in China’s yarn industry, over allegations that the factory had employed ethnic minorities in Xinjiang in “forced labor.”

Huafu is one of the world’s largest suppliers and manufacturers of dyed yarns, serving a wide range of international customers, from Nike and Adidas to H&M, Zara and Gap. It is also the leading supplier of high-end lingerie yarns designated by Victoria’s Secret.

And I’m going to go down. Huafu was targeted because of a report released in March 2020 by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, an Australian think-tank.

The report argues that between 2017 and 2019, more than 80,000 Uighurs were moved from Xinjiang to “forced labor” in factories across China. They also compiled what they called a count of at least 27 factories in China that received Uighurs in a “forced labor” program. Huafu is one of them.

The report also identified at least 83 international companies that use materials from these factories in their supply chains. The report therefore recommends that these multinationals “immediately conduct open and careful investigations into Labour rights in their supply chains”.

H&M responded to the survey in a hurry.

“There is no indication that forced Labour was involved in Huafu’s factory in Shangyu District, but it has been decided to wind down its indirect business relationship with Huafu Fashion over the next 12 months until allegations of forced Labour are ascertained,” H&M’s statement on the investigation read.

Also, H&M’s announcement of the cutting was made on Sept. 15. Not too soon, not too late, just on the heels of the United States announced on September 14 to ban imports of cotton and other commodities from six Chinese companies or institutions.

Separately, a list of companies, including Uniqlo and others, has been compiled online to boycott cotton from Xinjiang.

In response to a Japanese media inquiry, Uniqlo’s parent company Fast Retailing said in February that it would terminate or consider terminating its operations if its future partners were found to be involved in forced labor. Ryoshin, Muji’s parent company, says it uses cotton yarn certified by a third party.BCI was mentioned in the above H&M statement.

What exactly is BCI?

Its full name is The Better Cotton Initiative, which literally translates to The Association for The Development of Good Cotton.

The NGO, founded in Switzerland in 2009, promotes “good cotton”.

Supposedly, cotton only quality is good or bad, how to calculate “good”?

The BCI website explains that “good cotton” is threatened by two negative environmental and social factors.

It then lists environmental factors such as inefficient irrigation techniques and improper use of pesticides as well as social factors such as poor working conditions, child Labour and forced Labour.

As for how to judge these negative factors, BCI did not give much explanation, perhaps the subtext is “all the right of interpretation belongs to me”.

This is also for “forced labor” to find fault with Xinjiang cotton left the possibility.

In October last year, BCI announced on its website that it was suspending all live activities in China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

“Forced labor in any form is unacceptable,” the statement began. This was followed by a stark threat: “If this situation is discovered, it will be considered a violation of BCI standards and the license will be immediately cancelled or stripped.”

It is only in the second paragraph that we get into the main topic of the BCI statement.

It concluded that, based on “persistent allegations of forced labor and other human rights violations in China’s Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,” and “the increased risk of forced labor at the farm level, resulting in an untenable operating environment,” BCI had taken the decision to “immediately cease all field activities in the region.”

More Interesting Articles:
1.Chang ‘e-5 landed on the moon three consecutive victory, breathtaking fall of black science and technology open
2.Americans like to cook egg tarts hamburger steak chicken vegetables olive oil
3.Five hundred hours of Maradona’s life!!
4.The top-level design for deepening the reform of tax collection and administration was unveiled
5.Make Money From A Website,Make My Money Matter|2021-04-12
6.The UK government’s Department for Pensions bought 11,000 iPhone Ss at a 5% discount to the retail price
7.Immunity is the best doctor! To strengthen your immune system, keep your body in balance
8.The Pakistani government has passed a law to castrate rapists by chemical means

111 Real Ways to Actually Make Money Online
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Contact | About us | Sitemap
the contact email of business cooperation is